We have been looking at the onboarding problem.
Research ran five interviews, design prepared two directions, and engineering estimates three weeks.
Activation remains below target.
RecommendationThe team would like to run a pilot next month.
Need a document someone can decide from?
Minto makes Codex and Claude Code identify the reader's question before they edit the wording. The finished draft puts the answer first and shows where the support is weak.
Add the marketplace and install the plugin. Start a new session after installation.
codex plugin marketplace add welltraum/minto
codex plugin add minto@minto
Then invoke $minto or describe the writing problem directly.
/plugin marketplace add welltraum/minto
/plugin install minto@minto
Then invoke /minto:minto or let Claude route a matching request.
This fictional example keeps the same facts, but puts the decision first and shows how each fact supports it.
We have been looking at the onboarding problem.
Research ran five interviews, design prepared two directions, and engineering estimates three weeks.
Activation remains below target.
RecommendationThe team would like to run a pilot next month.
One source can produce four different outcomes. Choose the mode by what you need to know or make next.
intent
Identify the reader, the decision, and an answer that the available evidence can support.
Should we run an onboarding pilot next month?
One-sentence answer Approve a three-week pilot to test the two prepared directions. Evidence gapDefine the activation target before launch.
audit
Minto scores the structure, names the defect, and prescribes a fix. The original wording stays intact.
write
Use it for a memo or email, as well as one-pagers, updates, and deck storylines.
Activation is below target. Research completed five interviews, and design prepared two directions. Engineering estimates three weeks.
viz
Render the pyramid and SCQ flow in Mermaid or build a standalone interactive page for sharing.
Minto can work from an unclear goal or a draft that still feels wrong. You do not need to clean it up first.
Release benchmark, v1.5.0
Across Codex and Kimi, the skill arm scored 6.75/10 versus 5.63/10 for the control in the v1.5.0 release benchmark.
Change by engine
| Engine | Quality Δ | Structure Δ |
|---|---|---|
| Codex | +1.25 | +1.38 |
| Kimi | +1.00 | −0.38 |
| Both engines | +1.13 | +0.50 |
32 evaluated cells, with one run for each engine, arm, and fixture combination. Kimi's structure score fell by 0.38 even though its overall quality score rose. The benchmark shows an effect, but it does not guarantee improvement in every case.
Read the full methodology and limitationsInstall the plugin, paste your text, and ask Minto to fix the structure before it edits the wording.